<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<cvrfdoc xmlns="http://www.icasi.org/CVRF/schema/cvrf/1.1" xmlns:cvrf="http://www.icasi.org/CVRF/schema/cvrf/1.1">
	<DocumentTitle xml:lang="en">An update for kernel is now available for openEuler-24.03-LTS</DocumentTitle>
	<DocumentType>Security Advisory</DocumentType>
	<DocumentPublisher Type="Vendor">
		<ContactDetails>openeuler-release@openeuler.org</ContactDetails>
		<IssuingAuthority>openEuler release SIG</IssuingAuthority>
	</DocumentPublisher>
	<DocumentTracking>
		<Identification>
			<ID>openEuler-HotPatchSA-2024-1040</ID>
		</Identification>
		<Status>Final</Status>
		<Version>1.0</Version>
		<RevisionHistory>
			<Revision>
				<Number>1.0</Number>
				<Date>2024-11-22</Date>
				<Description>Initial</Description>
			</Revision>
		</RevisionHistory>
		<InitialReleaseDate>2024-11-22</InitialReleaseDate>
		<CurrentReleaseDate>2024-11-22</CurrentReleaseDate>
		<Generator>
			<Engine>openEuler HotPatchSA Tool V1.0</Engine>
			<Date>2024-11-22</Date>
		</Generator>
	</DocumentTracking>
	<DocumentNotes>
		<Note Title="Synopsis" Type="General" Ordinal="1" xml:lang="en">kernel security update</Note>
		<Note Title="Summary" Type="General" Ordinal="2" xml:lang="en">An update for kernel is now available for openEuler-24.03-LTS</Note>
		<Note Title="Description" Type="General" Ordinal="3" xml:lang="en">The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.

Security Fix(es):

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:  firmware_loader: Block path traversal  Most firmware names are hardcoded strings, or are constructed from fairly constrained format strings where the dynamic parts are just some hex numbers or such.  However, there are a couple codepaths in the kernel where firmware file names contain string components that are passed through from a device or semi-privileged userspace; the ones I could find (not counting interfaces that require root privileges) are:   - lpfc_sli4_request_firmware_update() seems to construct the firmware    filename from &quot;ModelName&quot;, a string that was previously parsed out of    some descriptor (&quot;Vital Product Data&quot;) in lpfc_fill_vpd()  - nfp_net_fw_find() seems to construct a firmware filename from a model    name coming from nfp_hwinfo_lookup(pf-&gt;hwinfo, &quot;nffw.partno&quot;), which I    think parses some descriptor that was read from the device.    (But this case likely isn&apos;t exploitable because the format string looks    like &quot;netronome/nic_%s&quot;, and there shouldn&apos;t be any *folders* starting    with &quot;netronome/nic_&quot;. The previous case was different because there,    the &quot;%s&quot; is *at the start* of the format string.)  - module_flash_fw_schedule() is reachable from the    ETHTOOL_MSG_MODULE_FW_FLASH_ACT netlink command, which is marked as    GENL_UNS_ADMIN_PERM (meaning CAP_NET_ADMIN inside a user namespace is    enough to pass the privilege check), and takes a userspace-provided    firmware name.    (But I think to reach this case, you need to have CAP_NET_ADMIN over a    network namespace that a special kind of ethernet device is mapped into,    so I think this is not a viable attack path in practice.)  Fix it by rejecting any firmware names containing &quot;..&quot; path components.  For what it&apos;s worth, I went looking and haven&apos;t found any USB device drivers that use the firmware loader dangerously.(CVE-2024-47742)

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:  driver core: bus: Fix double free in driver API bus_register()  For bus_register(), any error which happens after kset_register() will cause that @priv are freed twice, fixed by setting @priv with NULL after the first free.(CVE-2024-50055)

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:  mm/mremap: fix move_normal_pmd/retract_page_tables race  In mremap(), move_page_tables() looks at the type of the PMD entry and the specified address range to figure out by which method the next chunk of page table entries should be moved.  At that point, the mmap_lock is held in write mode, but no rmap locks are held yet.  For PMD entries that point to page tables and are fully covered by the source address range, move_pgt_entry(NORMAL_PMD, ...) is called, which first takes rmap locks, then does move_normal_pmd().  move_normal_pmd() takes the necessary page table locks at source and destination, then moves an entire page table from the source to the destination.  The problem is: The rmap locks, which protect against concurrent page table removal by retract_page_tables() in the THP code, are only taken after the PMD entry has been read and it has been decided how to move it.  So we can race as follows (with two processes that have mappings of the same tmpfs file that is stored on a tmpfs mount with huge=advise); note that process A accesses page tables through the MM while process B does it through the file rmap:  process A                      process B =========                      ========= mremap   mremap_to     move_vma       move_page_tables         get_old_pmd         alloc_new_pmd                       *** PREEMPT ***                                madvise(MADV_COLLAPSE)                                  do_madvise                                    madvise_walk_vmas                                      madvise_vma_behavior                                        madvise_collapse                                          hpage_collapse_scan_file                                            collapse_file                                              retract_page_tables                                                i_mmap_lock_read(mapping)                                                pmdp_collapse_flush                                                i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping)         move_pgt_entry(NORMAL_PMD, ...)           take_rmap_locks           move_normal_pmd           drop_rmap_locks  When this happens, move_normal_pmd() can end up creating bogus PMD entries in the line `pmd_populate(mm, new_pmd, pmd_pgtable(pmd))`.  The effect depends on arch-specific and machine-specific details; on x86, you can end up with physical page 0 mapped as a page table, which is likely exploitable for user-&gt;kernel privilege escalation.  Fix the race by letting process B recheck that the PMD still points to a page table after the rmap locks have been taken.  Otherwise, we bail and let the caller fall back to the PTE-level copying path, which will then bail immediately at the pmd_none() check.  Bug reachability: Reaching this bug requires that you can create shmem/file THP mappings - anonymous THP uses different code that doesn&apos;t zap stuff under rmap locks.  File THP is gated on an experimental config flag (CONFIG_READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS), so on normal distro kernels you need shmem THP to hit this bug.  As far as I know, getting shmem THP normally requires that you can mount your own tmpfs with the right mount flags, which would require creating your own user+mount namespace; though I don&apos;t know if some distros maybe enable shmem THP by default or something like that.  Bug impact: This issue can likely be used for user-&gt;kernel privilege escalation when it is reachable.(CVE-2024-50066)</Note>
		<Note Title="Topic" Type="General" Ordinal="4" xml:lang="en">An update for kernel is now available for openEuler-24.03-LTS.

openEuler Security has rated this update as having a security impact of high. A Common Vunlnerability Scoring System(CVSS)base score,which gives a detailed severity rating, is available for each vulnerability from the CVElink(s) in the References section.</Note>
		<Note Title="Severity" Type="General" Ordinal="5" xml:lang="en">High</Note>
		<Note Title="Affected Component" Type="General" Ordinal="6" xml:lang="en">kernel</Note>
	</DocumentNotes>
	<DocumentReferences>
		<Reference Type="Self">
			<URL>https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-HotPatchSA-2024-1040</URL>
		</Reference>
		<Reference Type="openEuler CVE">
			<URL>https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/cve/detail/?cveId=CVE-2024-47742</URL>
			<URL>https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/cve/detail/?cveId=CVE-2024-50055</URL>
			<URL>https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/cve/detail/?cveId=CVE-2024-50066</URL>
		</Reference>
		<Reference Type="Other">
			<URL>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47742</URL>
			<URL>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50055</URL>
			<URL>https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50066</URL>
		</Reference>
	</DocumentReferences>
	<HotPatchTree xmlns="http://www.icasi.org/CVRF/schema/prod/1.1">
		<Branch Type="Product Name" Name="openEuler">
			<FullProductName ProductID="openEuler-24.03-LTS" CPE="cpe:/a:openEuler:openEuler:24.03-LTS">openEuler-24.03-LTS</FullProductName>
		</Branch>
		<Branch Type="Package Arch" Name="src">
			<FullProductName ProductID="kernel-6.6.0-28.0.0.34.oe2403-ACC-1-3" CPE="cpe:/a:openEuler:openEuler:24.03-LTS">kernel-6.6.0-28.0.0.34.oe2403-ACC-1-3.src.rpm</FullProductName>
		</Branch>
		<Branch Type="Package Arch" Name="x86_64">
			<FullProductName ProductID="patch-kernel-6.6.0-28.0.0.34.oe2403-ACC-1-3" CPE="cpe:/a:openEuler:openEuler:24.03-LTS">patch-kernel-6.6.0-28.0.0.34.oe2403-ACC-1-3.x86_64.rpm</FullProductName>
		</Branch>
		<Branch Type="Package Arch" Name="aarch64">
			<FullProductName ProductID="patch-kernel-6.6.0-28.0.0.34.oe2403-ACC-1-3" CPE="cpe:/a:openEuler:openEuler:24.03-LTS">patch-kernel-6.6.0-28.0.0.34.oe2403-ACC-1-3.aarch64.rpm</FullProductName>
		</Branch>
	</HotPatchTree>
	<Vulnerability Ordinal="1" xmlns="http://www.icasi.org/CVRF/schema/cvrf/1.1">
		<Notes>
			<Note Title="Vulnerability Description" Type="General" Ordinal="1" xml:lang="en">In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

firmware_loader: Block path traversal

Most firmware names are hardcoded strings, or are constructed from fairly
constrained format strings where the dynamic parts are just some hex
numbers or such.

However, there are a couple codepaths in the kernel where firmware file
names contain string components that are passed through from a device or
semi-privileged userspace; the ones I could find (not counting interfaces
that require root privileges) are:

 - lpfc_sli4_request_firmware_update() seems to construct the firmware
   filename from &quot;ModelName&quot;, a string that was previously parsed out of
   some descriptor (&quot;Vital Product Data&quot;) in lpfc_fill_vpd()
 - nfp_net_fw_find() seems to construct a firmware filename from a model
   name coming from nfp_hwinfo_lookup(pf-&gt;hwinfo, &quot;nffw.partno&quot;), which I
   think parses some descriptor that was read from the device.
   (But this case likely isn&apos;t exploitable because the format string looks
   like &quot;netronome/nic_%s&quot;, and there shouldn&apos;t be any *folders* starting
   with &quot;netronome/nic_&quot;. The previous case was different because there,
   the &quot;%s&quot; is *at the start* of the format string.)
 - module_flash_fw_schedule() is reachable from the
   ETHTOOL_MSG_MODULE_FW_FLASH_ACT netlink command, which is marked as
   GENL_UNS_ADMIN_PERM (meaning CAP_NET_ADMIN inside a user namespace is
   enough to pass the privilege check), and takes a userspace-provided
   firmware name.
   (But I think to reach this case, you need to have CAP_NET_ADMIN over a
   network namespace that a special kind of ethernet device is mapped into,
   so I think this is not a viable attack path in practice.)

Fix it by rejecting any firmware names containing &quot;..&quot; path components.

For what it&apos;s worth, I went looking and haven&apos;t found any USB device
drivers that use the firmware loader dangerously.</Note>
		</Notes>
		<ReleaseDate>2024-11-22</ReleaseDate>
		<CVE>CVE-2024-47742</CVE>
		<ProductStatuses>
			<Status Type="Fixed">
				<ProductID>openEuler-24.03-LTS</ProductID>
			</Status>
		</ProductStatuses>
		<Threats>
			<Threat Type="Impact">
				<Description>High</Description>
			</Threat>
		</Threats>
		<CVSSScoreSets>
			<ScoreSet>
				<BaseScore>7.8</BaseScore>
				<Vector>AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</Vector>
			</ScoreSet>
		</CVSSScoreSets>
		<Remediations>
			<Remediation Type="Vendor Fix">
				<Description>kernel security update</Description>
				<DATE>2024-11-22</DATE>
				<URL>https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-HotPatchSA-2024-1040</URL>
			</Remediation>
		</Remediations>
	</Vulnerability>
	<Vulnerability Ordinal="2" xmlns="http://www.icasi.org/CVRF/schema/cvrf/1.1">
		<Notes>
			<Note Title="Vulnerability Description" Type="General" Ordinal="1" xml:lang="en">In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

driver core: bus: Fix double free in driver API bus_register()

For bus_register(), any error which happens after kset_register() will
cause that @priv are freed twice, fixed by setting @priv with NULL after
the first free.</Note>
		</Notes>
		<ReleaseDate>2024-11-22</ReleaseDate>
		<CVE>CVE-2024-50055</CVE>
		<ProductStatuses>
			<Status Type="Fixed">
				<ProductID>openEuler-24.03-LTS</ProductID>
			</Status>
		</ProductStatuses>
		<Threats>
			<Threat Type="Impact">
				<Description>High</Description>
			</Threat>
		</Threats>
		<CVSSScoreSets>
			<ScoreSet>
				<BaseScore>7.8</BaseScore>
				<Vector>AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</Vector>
			</ScoreSet>
		</CVSSScoreSets>
		<Remediations>
			<Remediation Type="Vendor Fix">
				<Description>kernel security update</Description>
				<DATE>2024-11-22</DATE>
				<URL>https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-HotPatchSA-2024-1040</URL>
			</Remediation>
		</Remediations>
	</Vulnerability>
	<Vulnerability Ordinal="3" xmlns="http://www.icasi.org/CVRF/schema/cvrf/1.1">
		<Notes>
			<Note Title="Vulnerability Description" Type="General" Ordinal="1" xml:lang="en">In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm/mremap: fix move_normal_pmd/retract_page_tables race

In mremap(), move_page_tables() looks at the type of the PMD entry and the
specified address range to figure out by which method the next chunk of
page table entries should be moved.

At that point, the mmap_lock is held in write mode, but no rmap locks are
held yet.  For PMD entries that point to page tables and are fully covered
by the source address range, move_pgt_entry(NORMAL_PMD, ...) is called,
which first takes rmap locks, then does move_normal_pmd(). 
move_normal_pmd() takes the necessary page table locks at source and
destination, then moves an entire page table from the source to the
destination.

The problem is: The rmap locks, which protect against concurrent page
table removal by retract_page_tables() in the THP code, are only taken
after the PMD entry has been read and it has been decided how to move it. 
So we can race as follows (with two processes that have mappings of the
same tmpfs file that is stored on a tmpfs mount with huge=advise); note
that process A accesses page tables through the MM while process B does it
through the file rmap:

process A                      process B
=========                      =========
mremap
  mremap_to
    move_vma
      move_page_tables
        get_old_pmd
        alloc_new_pmd
                      *** PREEMPT ***
                               madvise(MADV_COLLAPSE)
                                 do_madvise
                                   madvise_walk_vmas
                                     madvise_vma_behavior
                                       madvise_collapse
                                         hpage_collapse_scan_file
                                           collapse_file
                                             retract_page_tables
                                               i_mmap_lock_read(mapping)
                                               pmdp_collapse_flush
                                               i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping)
        move_pgt_entry(NORMAL_PMD, ...)
          take_rmap_locks
          move_normal_pmd
          drop_rmap_locks

When this happens, move_normal_pmd() can end up creating bogus PMD entries
in the line `pmd_populate(mm, new_pmd, pmd_pgtable(pmd))`.  The effect
depends on arch-specific and machine-specific details; on x86, you can end
up with physical page 0 mapped as a page table, which is likely
exploitable for user-&gt;kernel privilege escalation.

Fix the race by letting process B recheck that the PMD still points to a
page table after the rmap locks have been taken.  Otherwise, we bail and
let the caller fall back to the PTE-level copying path, which will then
bail immediately at the pmd_none() check.

Bug reachability: Reaching this bug requires that you can create
shmem/file THP mappings - anonymous THP uses different code that doesn&apos;t
zap stuff under rmap locks.  File THP is gated on an experimental config
flag (CONFIG_READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS), so on normal distro kernels you need
shmem THP to hit this bug.  As far as I know, getting shmem THP normally
requires that you can mount your own tmpfs with the right mount flags,
which would require creating your own user+mount namespace; though I don&apos;t
know if some distros maybe enable shmem THP by default or something like
that.

Bug impact: This issue can likely be used for user-&gt;kernel privilege
escalation when it is reachable.</Note>
		</Notes>
		<ReleaseDate>2024-11-22</ReleaseDate>
		<CVE>CVE-2024-50066</CVE>
		<ProductStatuses>
			<Status Type="Fixed">
				<ProductID>openEuler-24.03-LTS</ProductID>
			</Status>
		</ProductStatuses>
		<Threats>
			<Threat Type="Impact">
				<Description>High</Description>
			</Threat>
		</Threats>
		<CVSSScoreSets>
			<ScoreSet>
				<BaseScore>7.1</BaseScore>
				<Vector>AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H</Vector>
			</ScoreSet>
		</CVSSScoreSets>
		<Remediations>
			<Remediation Type="Vendor Fix">
				<Description>kernel security update</Description>
				<DATE>2024-11-22</DATE>
				<URL>https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-HotPatchSA-2024-1040</URL>
			</Remediation>
		</Remediations>
	</Vulnerability>
</cvrfdoc>